OK so Bright Star was in a win-win situation:
John Keats: check
Jane Campion: check
Ben Whishaw: check
The trailers were promising. Campion was going to have to do something pretty stupid for me not to like this film, for me not to love this film.
For those who don't know the story, it is told through the eyes of Fanny Brawne, the neighbour and object of romantic poet John Keats' affection and some would say muse. The two were unable to marry because Keats didn't have any money as his poetry was yet to gain mass market appeal and then his life was cut short by TB.
Keats wrote beautiful poetry and this is a beautiful film. The setting, showcasing the simple beauty of English nature is like a third character next to Brawne and Keats.
The script is kept simple almost with the attitude that less says more leaving Abbie Cornish who plays Brawne and Whishaw who plays Keats to showcase a more subtle side to their acting abilities.
There is one particular scene which cements Cornish as such a talent, I find it hard to believe that she could have produced such overwhelming emotion for more than one take. It is when Brawne finds out from Keats' friend Charles Brown that he has died in Rome, where he had traveled to for the good of his health to avoid the British winter.
The performance touches on such grief and heartbreak that it brings tears to my eyes just thinking about it. And it is up there with Juliet Stephenson in Truly Madly Deeply.
If I was to judge this film on tears alone, my tears that is, not the actors, it would get a very damp 10 out of 10 as blubbed the whole way through. And I wasn't the only one in the cinema.
Not that I particularly care but here are what some of the professionals thought:
Daily Telegraph "It’s by some measure the best film she’s ever made.
It feels special without being at all precious. Eloquent, too, but not
self-consciously lyrical or florid."
Time Out "A combination of unstuffy dialogue,
wise casting, unselfconscious performances and sensuous but never
pretty photography makes Campion’s version of the nineteenth century
feel current but not anachronistic."